Revisit of September 20, 2012 analysis:
Since the financial meltdown of October 2008, cumulatively, global debt was estimated to be $142 Trillion, and now is above $230 Trillion (McKinsey & Co. ING), and government debt is approximately an additional $60 Trillion.
In the past years, in a sustained effort to try and reverse the downward slide of the global economy, monetary stimulus became the norm.
Except for the prevention of the total free-fall that threatened, in the aftermath of the crash, the stubborn economic downward momentum has not been arrested.
The global economies seem to be straining mightily against the artificial lift the stimulus spending has been providing. In fact, there is a natural and persistent retrenchment need in the global economies that cannot be fully arrested by the multiple rounds of quantitative easing, stimulus spending or ultra low interest rates. Now, in the latest round of further stimulus, the European and Japanese Central Banks, have embraced the concept of negative interest rates (NIRP), as a final act of desperation.
The past three decades of lengthy upward trajectory was fueled by seemingly endless and increasing availability of easy money and credit. That liquidity sustained an orgy of conspicuous consumption in the developed economies, which in turn boosted and sustained an unprecedented growth in exports from the emerging economies. Thereby the emerging economies became richer, which in turn boosted their spending and consumption. And so the merry-go-round spun for almost three decades, complete with the music of constant wars, which injected additional Billions into the global system, through the militarized empires.
The music stopped everywhere when the easy credit and liquidity disappeared in the West, and the only thing that remained was a mountain of debt for both the governments and consumers. To arrest the global catastrophe the Fed and the other Central Banks, in a panic, decided to prime the pump at once and inject emergency liquidity into the global financial system to try and keep it afloat. But the limits of easy money had long been reached and the unsustainable, inflated global economic balloon had to burst. And now that it has burst, it is becoming increasingly obvious that just pumping more money into the system isn’t going to create sustainable growth. A key element is missing. That missing element is the unprecedented level of global consumption present before the crash.
Consumer consumption of those previous levels cannot return in the near term. The reasons are: the consumers of the developed economies are mostly spent, and are still carrying unprecedented levels of debt, accumulated over the long years of easy credit and unrestrained spending. Additionally, since the crash, in most of the developed economies, with the ultra low interest rates savings have been decimated. And most people are no longer sure that there is any real job security anywhere. Businesses and governments continue to downsize with the declines in GDP (Gross Domestic Product). The serious drop in consumption in the developed World has resulted in the predictable drop in exports from the emerging markets. Large galloping economies such as China and India have been yanked back to a little over half their pre-crash growth rates. The numbers that the some governments are posting as current growth rates are highly suspect, as these governments are loathe to exacerbate the situation further with real negative numbers.
Most major governments have been locked in a desperate struggle with their economies to try and prevent a total economic collapse. The dramatic drop in World trade and exports has resulted in unprecedented inventory accumulation, declining sales, manufacturing overcapacity, job losses, and increasing social and political unrest.
While consumer demand in the emerging economies continues to grow, albeit more slowly than before, it cannot substitute the missing consumption capacity of the far wealthier Western counterparts. Slowing developing economies means a slower rate of wealth creation, resulting in lesser number of the poor moving into a higher level of meaningful consumption. Additionally, citizens of the large emerging economies, lacking a social safety net are reluctant to spend with the same carefree abandon that the people in the West are able to do; instead they are prone to save an extraordinarily high percentage of their income for the proverbial rainy day. This gives their governments massive amounts of deposit capital to spend on stimulus funding, but government spending is seldom effective or efficient use of capital. A lot of the money is wasted in building highways to nowhere, empty malls and towns, patronage projects, poorly constructed infrastructure, or just plain stolen through endemic and persistent corruption. The population’s general distrust in their governments, their insecurity, and their far lesser level of wealth, makes them incapable of picking up the slack in consumption left by the Western Consumer, to make a difference in the relentless retrenchment that is taking place.
More than seven (7) years after the crash, with upward of $60 Trillion spent and an unprecedented amount of debt accumulated, the governments are once again watching with increasing alarm as some of the largest developed economies slip back to the edge of recession, while some of the smaller ones like Brazil, Russia, and Venezuela are falling over. The crossing over to the positive side of the economic growth chart that blipped on to the screens post 2008, seemed to be the classic ‘dead cat bounce’. The collective and massive financial stimulus infusion acted as the defibrillator to the free-falling financial markets, the ‘shock’ temporarily arresting the fall and jolting some of the economies over the line, into positive growth territory. Until the effect wore off - which it has, and subsequent booster-shots never did revive the proverbial cat.
As governments and their Central Banks once again pump more financial stimulus into the fading economies, one cannot help but wonder how long this latest cash injection will keep things going. At this point the additional stimulus is required to just try and prevent ‘hard landings’ in a number of economies, but it certainly will not result in a sustained and healthy recovery. Each national economy, in trying to resuscitate itself will encourage its people to buy nationally manufactured goods and services. That in-of-itself will pose additional problems to countries like China, that desperately need to return to pre-crash levels of exports. When China slows the World slows…and China is slowed. India and the other emerging economies have also slowed dramatically creating further drag on the global economic recovery. With the Western economies battling the slide back to the cliff edge, a recovery seems practically impossible.
True and sustained economic recovery will only be possible, firstly with the material reduction of consumer and government debt in the developed World, making possible the resumption of reduced but sustainable consumption and investment.
Secondly, the lesser consumption in the West will have to couple with the adjustment that the large emerging economies like China, India and Brazil will have to make, where their internal consumption substitutes for the yet-to-be-determined percentage of permanent drop in Western demand. Such adjustments are going to take a long time in manifesting, and so will any true recovery.
In the meantime, dangerously inflated financial and real estate bubbles have already burst and will further implode in China. And Europe’s Union is in doubt as of this time. In America everything is up in the air and its equity and bond markets are seriously bloated and ready for the pin prick.